http://ntresources.com/blog/?p=709 Dr. Rod Decker's blog for (mostly) New Testament-related discussion. Wed, 01 Sep 2010 01:44:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://ntresources.com/blog/?p=709&cpage=1#comment-485 Dr. Rod Decker Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:03:24 +0000 http://ntresources.com/blog/?p=709#comment-485 All very true. As I said, "This is not of great exegetical value." All very true. As I said, “This is not of great exegetical value.”

]]> http://ntresources.com/blog/?p=709&cpage=1#comment-484 PeterMHead Wed, 09 Dec 2009 00:09:12 +0000 http://ntresources.com/blog/?p=709#comment-484 This gives you sentences as defined by some editor's punctuation, but may not all actually be complete/independent sentences (e.g. Mark 4.3; but also Matt 11.9 // Luke 7.26 and other rhetorical questions within a dialogue; e.g. Rom 3.9). Also if 2 Pet 3.18 is a sentence, then there ought to be others as well (e.g. Rom 9.5; 11.36 etc.). What is a sentence anyway? This gives you sentences as defined by some editor’s punctuation, but may not all actually be complete/independent sentences (e.g. Mark 4.3; but also Matt 11.9 // Luke 7.26 and other rhetorical questions within a dialogue; e.g. Rom 3.9). Also if 2 Pet 3.18 is a sentence, then there ought to be others as well (e.g. Rom 9.5; 11.36 etc.).
What is a sentence anyway?

]]>